{"id":8100,"date":"2025-08-26T19:50:14","date_gmt":"2025-08-26T09:50:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/childethics.com\/?p=8100"},"modified":"2025-08-26T19:50:14","modified_gmt":"2025-08-26T09:50:14","slug":"this-is-not-me-a-critical-discussion-about-methodological-issues-concerning-agency-and-participatory-sense-making-in-qualitative-research-with-children","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/childethics.com\/library\/this-is-not-me-a-critical-discussion-about-methodological-issues-concerning-agency-and-participatory-sense-making-in-qualitative-research-with-children\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cThis is not me\u201d\u2013A critical discussion about methodological issues concerning agency and participatory sense-making in qualitative research with children."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Bjorb\u00e6kmo, W. S., Greve, A., &#038; Asbj\u00f8rnslett, M. (2022). \u201cThis is not me\u201d\u2013A critical discussion about methodological issues concerning agency and participatory sense-making in qualitative research with children. <em>International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>This open access article explores and discusses children&#8217;s agency in the context of research. It draws on three situations recorded in the reflexive notes of two of the authors undertaking research with children with various medical diagnosis and disabilities. Using a combined autoethnographic and enactive phenomenological approach, the authors explore moments where the child participants disagreed with, or rejected, prevailing notions of \u2018disability\u2019 applied to them. <\/p>\n<p>The full article is freely available to read and download via the Publisher&#8217;s Link below.<\/p>\n<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/16094069221118990\" target=\"\u201d_blank\u201d\" style=\"color:primary; text-decoration: none; padding: 10px 20px; border: 1px solid #ccc; display: inline-block;\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\">Publisher&#8217;s Link<\/a>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Bjorb\u00e6kmo, W. S., Greve, A., &#038; Asbj\u00f8rnslett, M. (2022). \u201cThis is not me\u201d\u2013A critical discussion about methodological issues concerning agency and participatory sense-making in qualitative research with children. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21. This open access article explores and discusses children&#8217;s agency in the context of research. It draws on three situations recorded in [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[111,119,29,779,44,805],"class_list":["post-8100","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-library","tag-agency","tag-disability","tag-power","tag-reflexive","tag-reflexivity","tag-relationality"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/childethics.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8100","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/childethics.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/childethics.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/childethics.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/childethics.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8100"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/childethics.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8100\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11550,"href":"https:\/\/childethics.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8100\/revisions\/11550"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/childethics.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8100"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/childethics.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8100"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/childethics.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8100"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}